<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To point oh or not two point oh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hartvig</title>
		<link>http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-73954</link>
		<dc:creator>Hartvig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 09:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/#comment-73954</guid>
		<description>lol - godt set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol — godt set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Johannsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-73468</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Johannsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/#comment-73468</guid>
		<description>Verden er konsekvent mangetydig og inkonsekvent ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verden er konsekvent mangetydig og inkonsekvent ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henriette Weber Andersen</title>
		<link>http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-72961</link>
		<dc:creator>Henriette Weber Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/#comment-72961</guid>
		<description>jeg syntes den kommunikativt er noget vrÃ¸vl... men man har vel et standpunkt indtil man tager et nyt =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeg syntes den kommunikativt er noget vrÃ¸vl… men man har vel et standpunkt indtil man tager et nyt =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pollas</title>
		<link>http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-72894</link>
		<dc:creator>pollas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/#comment-72894</guid>
		<description>@bÃ¸tter: you tell me ;-)

&quot;NÃ¥r vi i Geezer ikke bruger begrebet skizofreni, er det fordi det mangetydigt&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bÃ¸tter: you tell me ;-)</p>
<p>“NÃ¥r vi i Geezer ikke bruger begrebet skizofreni, er det fordi det mangetydigt”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas madsen-mygdal</title>
		<link>http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-72891</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas madsen-mygdal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/#comment-72891</guid>
		<description>Det term gÃ¸r mig konsekvent skizofren...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Det term gÃ¸r mig konsekvent skizofren…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob BÃ¸tter</title>
		<link>http://blog.pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-72889</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob BÃ¸tter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollas.dk/2007/05/22/to-point-oh-or-not-two-point-oh/#comment-72889</guid>
		<description>Man kan vel sagtens tale OM et fÃ¦nomen som Web2.0, men kalde det social software i stedet? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man kan vel sagtens tale OM et fÃ¦nomen som Web2.0, men kalde det social software i stedet? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
