So, the tsunami came, a lot of people died and now people all over the world are helping the best they can. Which is great. The blogosphere has proven its worth once again, coming up with various creative ways of raising money.
What is quite a problem however, is that while a true disaster, the tsunami isn’t nowhere near our biggest global problem when it comes to people in need. “Africa? Yeah, I know, but they’ve been like dying since the eighties, right? Aren’t they more used to it?” So, while helping Asia, please keep in mind, that more people could use some help as well.
Media coverage rules. Media coverage needs pictures and stories. Sad but true — and a bit understandable. Goal for 2005: Why not see if we can get the same traction focused on other important issues? We need good stories, otherwise the ‘blogging thing’ seem misplaced? No, we make stories.
Update: After finally reading today’s Information I’m shocked and saddened to learn that most of the promised contributions by different countries, the UN etc., often don’t make it to the receiving countries. Call me naive, but I sort of thought most it got there… For instance, after the 2003 earthquake in Bam less than 2% of the money promised were actually payed meaning that no rebuilding has really taken place. If this is true, there’s a much better way to help than to donate small amounts yourself: Just make sure your government practice what they preach. Here, the established media could make a difference; they got the resources to reseach, follow up etc. And I don’t like my tax money being given away more than once but never delivered — and I suppose a lot of people would feel the same. That said, I still think the blogosphere is capable of quite a lot. We collect money for software development, new powerbooks and whatnot. And if someone can raise $1300+ to help transport dogs from one country to another after being screwed by their carrier just by being mentioned on The Daily Source Code (I won’t link either as this isn’t pointing fingers in any way!), I hope we could raise a lot more than that for the really important problems of the world. And this isn’t the usual “oh, so we can just cut any support to the arts for five years as this isn’t saving lives anyway”-discussion. That’s not what it is about. If that was true, I shouldn’t be writing this on an expensive laptop sitting in my comfy chair. But if dog lovers can sell their story to people who care about dogs, people lovers should be able to sell the story about starvation in Africa to people who care about…people.
Good point.
The Copenhagen Consensus set out some goals for how the global community should fight poverty. The goals were ranked based on best ROI since it was a study based on how to best use a certain amount of money. The blogosphere has other means than just money, so maybe we should have a Blogosphere Consensus that highlights an action plan for the charity work of the blogosphere.